Acts of anti-Semitism are also acts of hate

An act of hate against one faith, culture or identity is an affront to all. It is time for UConn to be an outspoken voice for change. Photo by Daniel Reche from Pexels.

Hate, like high blood pressure, often goes undetected until it becomes too severe to counter effectively. From a contemporary vantage point, hate is all too familiar. It is the baseless instinct that has created spaces for intolerance and violence in our communities. It is the racist ideology that continues to consciously and subconsciously inform the actions of all too many Americans. It is the loss of our humanity; the inability to appreciate and accept each other’s differences; and the moral paralysis that has struck our nation. From this vantage point, we can vividly understand why hate must be denounced in all its forms, and why we—at the University of Connecticut—have a unique role to play in addressing hate and intolerance. 

On Oct. 7 the words “The Third Reich” were found written on a white board outside a student’s door in South Campus. Not two weeks passed before a swastika was found in the hallway of yet another residence hall in South Campus. To add insult to injury, on Oct. 14, an anonymous post appeared on the @JewishOnCampus Instagram page alleging a UConn professor equated the atrocities of Nazi Germany with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On Oct. 25 yet another act of vandalism inspired by hate was found on South Campus, this time in Wilson Hall. This time, in tearing down images of a kinara and menorah, the perpetrator targeted both the African-American and Jewish communities. While each one of these incidences may be isolated, they demonstrate a rising tide of hate and anti-Semitism on college campuses that is finally making landfall at the University of Connecticut.  

The current reaction by the President Katsouleas and his administration has been wholly inadequate. To date, the South Campus incidents have been addressed through a town hall for students of these residence halls, and a public statement released Friday, Oct. 30. Most of the individuals who attended the town hall were either staff, members of the Jewish community or resident assistants on South Campus. While this virtual gathering provided a productive outlet to discuss hatred and anti-Semitism, it was not enough. Not to mention, the university has not responded to the allegations of the @JewishOnCampus post. The tacit acceptance of such ignorance at the faculty level represents an affront to the Jewish community. To compare the systematic, targeted murder of millions of European Jews with the bloody Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a false equivalency. 

Although the university administration denounced these anti-Semitic actions, they did so too little, too late. Unfortunately, this delayed reaction follows a striking pattern of hesitation in responding to acts of hate on our campus. Simply put, our administration needs to respond to these incidences sooner. In order to do so, the university should bolster its existing response protocol to hate incidences that target other minority communities. Furthermore, the university should make public the outcome of their ongoing investigation into South Campus incidents. Lastly, the university should muster its power as an institution of higher education, and address the dangerous misconceptions that produce hate and anti-Semitism. Put plainly, UConn needs to be much more transparent in its response to incidents of hate across campus.  

UConn’s mission statement claims that the university seeks for each student to “grow intellectually and become a contributing member of the state, national, and world communities.” If this is to be accomplished, UConn must be outspoken in denouncing hate in all forms including anti-Semitism, anti-Black racism, xenophobia, and homophobia. It must educate its student body to understand and appreciate the stories of historically oppressed communities. Most importantly, UConn must ensure that course material is taught in a factually nuanced way, which addresses the full scope of perspectives.  

 “Through education and scholarship, we address the needs of our students to understand and contextualize the world around us, empower them with that knowledge, and address the misperceptions that underlie bias and bigotry.”

In a July 23 message addressing UConn’s response to anti-Black racism, President Katsouleas and Chief Diversity Officer Tuitt eloquently stated that teaching and learning are what we do best as a university. “Through education and scholarship, we address the needs of our students to understand and contextualize the world around us, empower them with that knowledge, and address the misperceptions that underlie bias and bigotry.” As a member of the Jewish community, I agree; and I intend to hold the UConn Administration responsible for the values it espouses. An act of hate against one faith, culture, or identity is an affront to us all. It is time for our university to be an outspoken voice for change: to educate, speak up, and speak out against anti-Semitism, anti-Black racism, and all forms of hate on our campus.  


  1. Matan Doran’s says that you cannot compare the systematic, targeted murder of millions of European Jews with the bloody Israel-Palestine conflict. He is right. You have to compare the systematic, targeted killing of millions of European Jews with the terrorism and ethnic cleansing of almost one million Palestinians by the Jews, with the cultural genocide involved in the destruction of Palestinian villages and the renaming of Palestinian streets, with the open air prison that is Gaza where the “most moral army in the world gives haircuts to the people there by bombing them, with the apartheid in the occupied territories, with land theft in Israel and the occupied territories, with the theft of water, with the destruction of olive groves by the settlers, with the lawless killing of Palestinians by settlers and soldiers. When you make that comparison, you can have a discussion about settler colonialism. This is a discussion that Matan Doron does not want to have. He would rather talk about anti-Semitism. This is why Mr. Doron falsely talks about a bloody conflict instead of the truth which is that Israel is committing crimes against humanity. By the way. I am Jewish and my extended family was murdered by the Nazis but that does not give me the right to steal other people’s land.

Leave a Reply